RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lisa Shimamura <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 23 Jun 2006 09:34:27 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
I am aware of the information that is out there related to why records need
to be placed on hold and how important this is.  What I am trying to find
out is whether or not there are other Records Managers out there who are
actually being held responsible for the communication of holds within their
organization.  In my 20+ years of RM experience the Legal department in the
organizations that I have worked are always responsible for notificatoin of
hold requirements since they are the ones who deal with the litigation
discovery requests details, etc.  It would be great to know if there are any
other Records Managers out there that have reservations about taking on this
responsibility or if I am just being overly cautious.

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2