RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:41:18 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (74 lines)
If you're not doing anything wrong or illegal, in other words it is the
real email, it would just verify the electronic version. I guess it
really depends. If you have nothing to fear why worry? Most will
probably agree with Bill. Of course, the original electronic is the best
but, if the hardcopy is what you do in the regular course of business...


Steve Morgan
C.J. Segerstrom & Sons, Records Manager
[log in to unmask]
714.438.3228 Phone
714.546.9835 Fax

-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Brent Reid
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 9:06 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Email Retention

Unless you are using a certified Document Management system; how can you
prove, in Court, that the paper copy of an email that you present to the
Judge, is IDENTICAL To the original email?

Anyone in the industry knows how easily documents can be manipulated
between time of receipt and time of printing to show what the
Organization wants to be shown.

How would You like to be facing a Judge with a Printout of an email
against a Defendant that had an electronic trail of the email to show in
Court, which proves your client did some thing wrong?

CYA

That is what Records Management is all about.

-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Roach, Bill J.
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 10:13 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Email Retention

>>From what I have been reading lately, courts have been less likely to
accept printouts of email and require the "native format".  What are the
comments about this?<<

Wouldn't surprise me if both the electronic and paper copies existed.
Electronic copy would probably be best evidence. However, if the only
copy is paper and it is in the files, and standard practice is to print
emails that are records and store them as paper copies, and you do it in
the regular course of business, I don't think the court would even
question it.

However, once there is notice...or reasonable anticipation...I would
recommend the delete switch be turned off.

Bill R

Bill Roach, CRM
Enterprise EDMS Coordinator
State of North Dakota
ITD/Records Management
701-328-3589

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2