Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:22:28 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hello Records Gurus!
As a longtime lurker, I have posted only occasionally. Now the need
arises again and I am looking for some consideration of an issue all of
us are dealing with. Scanning, and the law. We are considering a change
to our municipal code which will allow for the storage of scanned copies
of original paper.
Our current code reads,
" records that are worn or damaged, may be copied by photostatic,
photographic, microphotographic, microfilm or other mechanical process
which produces a clear, accurate and permanent copy."
We are thinking of adding "or optical disk imaging system process" in
order to capture documents scanned into electronic records. Is it too
narrow a descriptor?
Any suggestions on simple, elegant wording for this?
Carpe Records from sunny Alaska,
Toby
Toby Allen
Records Management Supervisor
Municipality of Anchorage
[log in to unmask]
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
|
|
|