RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Allen, Doug" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:34:41 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
Does anyone on the listserve have a story to tell about success with
efforts to limit either the numbers of records series that they have?
OR success in establishing a limited set of retention time periods?  I'd
love to hear about it.

One of my "pet theories" that goes back a decade or so, is that it would
be great if we could establish government sanctioned retention periods
in a limited set for any records where there was a legitimate retention
need.  That could greatly simplify legal research and further force
decisions by federal agencies to specify retention requirements.  We do
have the 3-year default provision at the federal level, and I think in
five U.S. states as well, but I don't believe that we've gone much
beyond that limited help for Records Managers and for their employers
just yet.

Doug Allen, CRM, CDIA+

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2