However, given the relationship of this issue, and similar issues in the past and not-so-distant past -- to our professional work as records and information managers, and archivists, I can't see how we can simply ignore this issue. It has profound meaning to our work.



Brenda Parnes
Regional Advisory Officer, Region 1
New York State Archives
55 Hanson Place, Suite 724
Brooklyn, NY 11217
718-923-4300
FAX - 718-923-4302
[log in to unmask]
>>> "Link, Gary M." <[log in to unmask]> 06/26/07 3:06 PM >>>
This list did discuss at length the Berger incident when it happened, as
a search on the list archives will show.  
But the Cheney issue is current, so we are discussing Cheney. But we can
compare/contrast it with Berger if you want. 

So maybe you think one guy was "in the rights" and the other guy was
evil, depending on you politics. Rufus Miles (whoever he was) said
"Where you stand depends on where you sit."  Me, I stand with keeping
this list apolitical.

Gary Link
Pittsburgh, PA


-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Childress [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 2:42 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [RM] Executive order 12958 or Sandy Burger's socks

Anyone have an opinion on whether VP Cheney should comply with National
Archives security inspections of his classified information sieve/office
or should we be focusing on Sandy Burger's socks instead?

Anyone?

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance