Although it was a very long time ago, I remember one case from about 15
or 20 years back that will always stick in my mind. It was Piper
Aircraft and the judge called their retention schedule a sham. Some
records that met their retention were destroyed and some were not. The
judge determined they were selectively destroying records.

Steve Morgan
C.J. Segerstrom & Sons, Records Manager 
[log in to unmask]
714.438.3228 Phone
714.546.9835 Fax

Information which is not communicated is valueless 
Information which cannot be found is worthless 

-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Roger Hamperian
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 11:30 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: records destruction

Can anyone recommend some case studies that illustrate the hazards of
not destroying records that have met their required retention?

 

Thanks,

 

Roger Hamperian

L.F.U.C.G. Records Center and Archives

Lexington, KY 

 


List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of
the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]