RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Multiple years of records in the same box?
From:
"Richard G. King, Jr." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 5 Sep 2007 07:56:34 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines) 
Tracey Ann Black wrote:

>I disagree.  If your company is doing things correctly in the first place I believe the VIRTUAL cost of keeping records a years or two longer than needed outweighs the ACTUAL cost of keeping half or partial filled boxes.  The only RISK would be if you had incrememnating records.
>   
>  Just my 75 cents!
>   
>  Diva of Docs
>  
>
I don't know about you, but for those of us in the public sector the 
retention period is an absolute not a minimum.  If  one is "keeping 
records a years (sic) or two longer than needed" then either the records 
program is not working or the retention scedule is wrong.  Dick King, 
University of Arizona.


List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2