RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Chris Flynn <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 5 Sep 2007 16:14:03 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (44 lines)
Laurie,

"I've re-read this several times and it seems as though
they are both saying that you should set your retention period and stick
to it."

That is good advice.


"If the posting is saying that the opinion that in one context setting 
MINIMUMS instead of set periods are ok, in which context?"

Typically, the ones I have seen are driven by agency triggers.


"When in having to defend a RIM program, why wouldn't the same questions 
apply to either
public or private sector?"

Because they are different.


"How are the risks different between public and private if an 
agency/organization or a company sets minimums vs. absolute retention 
periods?"

Wow! that is a thread unto itself.

Chris Flynn

Peter,

Oops, I deleted the previous messages. Sorry, next time I will leave them 
on.

_________________________________________________________________
Get a FREE small business Web site and more from Microsoft® Office Live! 
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/aub0930003811mrt/direct/01/

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2