Sharon:

Glad you mentioned those last two as many organizations lump everything into
one file.  I think this is a crazy way to store these types of records
because it forces the organization in to a very labor intensive process of
weeding (or ignoring the retention on some of the record types).

On 9/18/07, Sharon Burnett <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> T + 6 is based on the statute of limitations for the state of Washington.
> Here I do T + 7 since we have to take into account California.
>
> And this is strictly personnel records - not medical, retirement, etc.
>
> Rock on!
> SharonSharon Burnett Seattle Washington USA "If it ain't broke, take it
> apart and see why. If it is broke, take it apartand see why."
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
> To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
> present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the
> message.
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
>



-- 
Graham Kitchen
OTECH International
(866) 333-2015

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]