RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bill Roach <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 20 Sep 2007 12:36:34 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
>>Abdicating your role in advising your organization on best practices is
not doing your job, even if no one is currently listening.<<

Give me a break, I am not abdicating my role within the organization.
Neither am I advocating retaining email forever.

What I am considering is that many distributed documents are copies for
informational purposes only and have a very limited retention timeframe.
Forcing users to store them in alternative locations may be creating even
more difficult issues than the one it is intended to solve.  First, where do
all the copies go and what are they named?  How do we efficiently manage all
of these distributed copies?  How do we account for the multiple versions
that may exist?

Granted, ECM/ERM technology provides a long term solution and we are working
on that.  But in the near term, should the standard concept of best practice
be challenged?

No offense, but if the best practice of placing limits on mailbox sizes was
working, we wouldn't be having this discussion on the list.

Bill R, CRM

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2