RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Creamer, William" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:45:49 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (47 lines)
I believe e-mail box limits can work, given certain specifics. Give your
users a tool or tools to do the job (such as rules based electronic
archiving) to archive records, let them "enhance" that process with
their own review and assessment, then give them size and or time limits
to make them do it, embed it in the business process so it's as seamless
as possible, and it will (mostly) get done. In my organization, no
action on the part of the user means deletion, so no action results in
an action that is not recoverable. It is a bit harsh, but it keeps us
focused on setting rules and doing due diligence review, at least in a
cursory fashion. Since the ability to save e-mail is between one click
and/or a rule away, it's not very burdensome. Sharon, as Jesse says, the
only thing worse then user based records declaration are all the
alternatives. Rules do help users manage the volume, but in the end the
user has to be the final arbiter. Notice that even e-mail filters give
you a chance to see what they filtered - and reverse it.

Jesse, I especially like the first paragraph of your last e-mail. Well
said. 

I don't think that Google and Yahoo are good comparisons or examples for
a number of reasons, but the biggest being they are in the e-mail (and
advertising, other) businesses, while our organizations are not. Their
marketing plan may well require their e-mail offerings to operate at a
huge loss against their advertising revenue, and their market share
goals. We also are not likely to do e-mail as well as the specialists
can, nor will we ever have the resources to devote to it that they do.
Similarly, I wouldn't advocate that my organization should do its own
off site storage, we can never compete with the off site storage
outsourcers, nor can we use their methods, or learn much from them on
how to manage our records, because our focus is different, and our goals
are different as well.   

William Creamer
New York, New York
(212) 728-3448


***********************************************************************

IMPORTANT NOTICE:  This e-mail message is intended to be received only by persons entitled to receive the confidential information it may contain.  E-mail messages to clients of Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP presumptively contain information that is confidential and legally privileged; e-mail messages to non-clients are normally confidential and may also be legally privileged.  Please do not read, copy, forward or store this message unless you are an intended recipient of it.  If you have received this message in error, please forward it back.  Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP is a limited liability partnership organized in the United States under the laws of the State of Delaware, which laws limit the personal liability of partners.
***********************************************************************

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2