On 9/26/07, Molly Kitchen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Larry thanks for your reply but I respectfully have to disagree.  For each
> Document Management application created you need a property (metadata)
> date
> field to trigger retention.  There has to be a marriage between DM and RM
> when creating and maintaining applications to ensure that key Record
> Management specific property fields are present.  I view a Taxonomy as a
> way to manage property, security, and retention rules per
> application.  And
> that information would be useful for DM and RM.


I'll let the list weigh in on this.  I think this is a case of not fully
understanding terminologies.

A DM is a Document Management system... retention IS NOT a common component.

An RM is a Records Management system... retention is a REQUIRED component.

Taxonomy, Controlled Language,  Ontology, whatever else you call it is a
requirement to properly access information stored in one or the other, but
does not routinely or always include security, retention, or other aspects
related to the information.

Larry
-- 
Larry Medina
Danville, CA
RIM Professional since 1972

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]