RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Personnel File/Employee File, Retention of
From:
Joyce Sayed <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 1 Oct 2007 15:12:59 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines) 
Hi,
 
Do you have the California Code for the Statute of
Limitations that you are referring to that requires 7 years?
 Thanks.
 
Joyce Sayed, Records Manager
E-mail   [log in to unmask] 


>>> [log in to unmask] 9/18/2007 9:56 AM >>>

T + 6 is based on the statute of limitations for the state
of Washington. Here I do T + 7 since we have to take into
account California. 

And this is strictly personnel records - not medical,
retirement, etc.

Rock on!
SharonSharon Burnett Seattle Washington USA "If it ain't
broke, take it apart and see why. If it is broke, take it
apartand see why."
List archives at
http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html 
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not
already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB
RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]



List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2