I prefer file folder than ring binder because paper can be torn if the ring 
binder fell. Sometimes, people don't treat records carefully when it was 
transferred to records center.

Tubagus Rifza
Jakarta, Indonesia

> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Gary Grieme" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: "Tubagus Rifza" <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 7:55 AM
> Subject: Re: Storing records : File folder versus Ring Binder ?
>
>
>> People like ring binders for certain active documents and
>> applications.  They're good for locking papers inside so they can't spill
>> out.  They're attractive--you can put good labels on the spine and they 
>> can
>> stand up unsupported.  Downsides are they tend to be more expensive than
>> folders, and they take up more space.  I've dealt with binders so massive
>> you couldn't fit two of them inside a standard box.  My firm removes
>> inactive documents from binders before they're put into storage.

>> Gary Grieme
>> Records Manager

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]