RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: FW: [RM] HELP! lawyers want to take over the RM policy with a book on legal holds....
From:
Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:28:22 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines) 
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Johnson Jr., Earl <[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> Does this mean that non-records appear as a records series on your
> approved retention schedules?  What about drafts?  Should they also
> appear on a records retention schedule?
>

in the old days of RM I remember seeing retention schedules that addressed
the issue of copies and drafts. Remember the term "office of record" this
identified who owned the particular record. this told users that had a copy
that they didn't need to retain it.


-- 
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2