Well said!!!
Josée Dallaire
[log in to unmask]
"Grevin, Fred" <[log in to unmask]>
Sent by: Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
09/25/2008 03:38 PM
Please respond to
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
To
[log in to unmask]
cc
Subject
Re: E-mail, Instant & Text Message Record Destruction
Graham said (in part): "I think most people have been sucked into the IT
lie that email is complicated (kinda like the Emperor's New Clothes)."
Graham, dealing with electronic records generally, and email in
particular, is more troublesome--as well as more complicated--for several
reasons I can think of "off the top of my head" (I'm looking forward to
other postings on this subject by others more knowledgeable than I!).
In my mind, most of the problem focusses on the costs of analysis and
classification of the content. Here are some contributing factors:
1. Volume: the volume of individual electronic records created and
received greatly exceeds that of hard copy records. This means more time
has to be spent analysing the content, categorising each record, and
placing a copy in the appropriate place.
2. Complexity of content: many electronic records are comprised of
several components, often in different file formats. The classic example
is an email message with a word-processing file, a spreadsheet, and a
presentation attached. This situation greatly complicates the tasks of
analysis and classification--increasing the amount of time required and
also the potential error rate. Also, if preservation of the records over a
longer period than months is required, separating the attachements from
the message--while of course maintaining the provenance, context and
authenticity--will be necessary. Oh, and did I mention file format
conversion for digital preservation?
3. Workflow: traditionally, hard copy records came into the organisation
through a relatively small number of "doorways": postal service, fax,
hand-delivery, etc. Today, most of these doorways are still used, but are
augmented by many others: email, Web browsers, RSS feeds, blogs, direct
electronic system transfers (such as electronic funds transfers), and many
more (I'll let Jesse Wilkins fill in the gaps in my list). Some of these
new doorways provide for automated analysis and classification, many do
not--at least not at the level of sophistication we need for effective
records management. I'm writing this message from my BlackBerry, and can
vouch for its limitations in that area! This is a big and, IMHO,
insufficiently appreciated, problem.
4. Staff (dedicated): you may or may not be old enough to recall the time
when every organisation had secretaries and file clerks, whose job it was
to perform the analysis and classification--and eventual filing--of all
records received and created by the organisation. Those days are gone.
Today, almost every person in the organisation is his/her own secretary
and file clerk, while expected to be EVEN MORE PRODUCTIVE than ever,
thanks to the software that produces that tidal wave of records. I report
to the Counsel to the Mayor of New York City, and I can tell you (1) he
gets at least 80% of his records by BlackBerry, and (2) the thought he
might have to spend a significant part of his long working day analysing
and classifying that content is a non-starter. What about YOUR boss?
5. Analysis and classification tools: are everyone's Best Great Hope for
solving the problem, but, to date, are simply too dumb (they are computer
systems, after all) to be highly effective in any but the most specialised
work environments (see #6 below).
6. Business culture: in some businesses (law and consulting firms come to
mind), tracking your working time by the hour or quarter-hour, and
assigning it to a cost category, are built into the culture. In other
types of businesses (architecture, software developmenr and engineering
firms come to mind), rigorous control of documents (and versions thereof)
are similarly an integral part of the business culture. In such
businesses, applying the basic rules you (and others) cite is relatively
(relatively!) easy to set up and to enforce. However, most organisations
do not have this type of culture and, in the US, neither do most
government agencies. So we're back to the unpleasant equation that the
available resources simply do not equal the task requirements.
7. Costs (cash): there are software tools to help in these tasks, and of
course one can hire staff, too. But all this requires money, and lots of
it, not merely to license the software, but also to configure, maintain
and train your staff to use it at greatest efficiency. The more different
tools, the more the cost. I'm tempted to say the old secretaries and file
clerks were a bargain!
There's more to say, but I'm getting BlackBerry Thumbs Cramp.
Best regards.
-----------------------------------
Fred Grevin
[log in to unmask]
(by BlackBerry)
----- Original Message -----
From: Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thu Sep 25 09:29:08 2008
Subject: [RM] E-mail, Instant & Text Message Record Destruction
I think most people have been sucked into the IT lie that email is
complicated (kinda like the Emperor's New Clothes).
This list serve does not hear from me very often, but when I post, it is
to
point out that we must stick to basics.
What would we do with a hard copy letter or a memo that contains the
information that we currently receive in an email? The answer?..... we
would classify it and place it in a folder titled with the subject matter
of
the communication. Why is it so difficult to create folders on a hard
drive
and do the same thing with email? Each directory file would have a
specific
retention that matches a hard copy of a similar subject matter. The
employee does not make the decisions of what and how long, they were not
hired to do that; the records manager was and the IT manager was hired to
decide on the how.
When doing a RIM survey, one of the questions that should be asked is "In
the course of doing your job, what information do you collect, create
and/or
disseminate?". The answers to this question must all be included in the
retention schedule in some way.
If we are dealing with instructions from a boss regarding an accounts
payable situation, where would we file it? If we are dealing with a joke
that is being circulated, where would we file it? If we are dealing with
a
comment from a co-worker about the way another co-worker dresses, where
would we file it?... and so it goes. With common sense :) we would know
what is a record and what is not a record.
Why does it become complicated because of the delivery method? If we have
a
retention schedule that is complete, it is the retention schedule that is
the deciding factor in how long and where the information is to be kept.
The decisions should already be made. If something is missing, add it.
why is that so hard?
--
Graham Kitchen
OTECH International
(866) 333-2015
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the
message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
***********************************************************************************************************************
This message, including any attachments, is privileged and may contain confidential information intended only for the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply email and permanently delete the original transmission from the sender, including any attachments, without making a copy. Thank you.
Ce message, y compris toutes ses pièces jointes, est confidentiel et peut contenir des renseignements destinés uniquement aux personnes dont le nom est indiqué ci-dessus. Si vous n?êtes pas le destinataire prévu ou si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur, veuillez en aviser l?expéditeur immédiatement, en lui répondant par courriel. Veuillez aussi supprimer définitivement le message original de l?expéditeur, y compris toute pièce jointe, sans faire de copie. Merci.
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
