RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Graham Kitchen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 25 Sep 2008 16:47:07 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (72 lines)
For the sake of argument, let's say I owed $75.00 to sears and I received a
letter saying "pay up or we'll send out da boys".  Would this not be an
accounts payable issue to be filed under Sears?  The same would apply to an
email that I receive on the same subject matter.

The records manager (along with the retention committee) would have already
decided that the Accounts Payable file for Sears is (let's say) 6 years.

What difficult decision has to be made?  We have already decided it is an
Accounts Payable issue because I owe the money - and who do I owe it too
(excuse my English... to whom do I owe the money?)

If you would handle it in this manner with a paper document, why not do the
same electronically?  Make a directory for your Accounts Payable accounts
that would have a six year retention .  IT can then purge the directory of
any documents that are over six years old.  A slightly different procedure
would be required if there is legal Hold.

On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Deanna Brouillette <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Graham wrote:  "Each directory file would have a specific
> retention that matches a hard copy of a similar subject matter.  The
> employee does not make the decisions of what and how long, they were not
> hired to do that; the records manager was and the IT manager was hired to
> decide on the how."
>
> But aren't we still asking the employee to make the decision on how long
> the record will be retained by asking him or her to choose the correct
> folder?  Or are you talking about auto-classification?
>
>
> Thank you,
> Deanna L. Brouillette, CRM
> Records Manager
> Chesapeake Energy Corporation
> Phone: (405) 767-4747
> Mobile:  (405) 706-2745
> Email: [log in to unmask]
>
>
>
> This email (and attachments if any) is intended only for the use of the
> individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information
> that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable
> law.  If the reader of this email is not the intended recipient, or the
> employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
> this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by return
> email and destroy all copies of the email (and attachments if any).
>
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
> To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
> present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the
> message.
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
>



-- 
Graham Kitchen
OTECH International
(866) 333-2015

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2