RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"deMarteleire, Margaret" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 17 Nov 2008 10:15:37 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (233 lines)
All of the records we're discussing have to do with the historical need
to keep track of property and inheritance - think England 5-600 years
ago.  The use and existence of these records is a legal construct, along
the lines of recording marriages and divorces.  We no longer have
primogeniture and the limbo-like existence of illegitimate children, but
it nonetheless helps with property claims to have records of births,
parents, etc.  When a person is adopted, the relationship with the birth
parents is officially declared nonexistent.  It never was.  The adoptive
parents are and legally always were the only parents.  The courts can
rewrite history in some circumstances, adoption and annulment among
them.  The rationale for the transgender changes as well as (in part)
the adoption changes is protection of the privacy of the individuals
involved.  If we were, as a society, more comfortable with adoption and
gender reassignment we probably wouldn't feel the need to protect
privacy in those instances because there would be no shame attached.
We're not there yet.  Think of how we don't release the names of sexual
assault victims. 

 

Our relationships are "verified" by the legal system, no matter how much
we may think of them as personal.  And that which gives can take away -
names, birthplaces, parents, etc.  Records are as permanent as the law
needs them to be. 

 

Margie

Margaret M. deMarteleire

HR/FLSA Analyst

CDI Corporation

1717 Arch Street, 35th Floor

Philadelphia, PA 19103

(215) 636-1219

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of DuWayne Headrick
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 9:33 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Transgender student records

 

As the Records Management Officer for 15 years at a School District in

Texas I had never given this subject a thought until it happened twice

in the last two years.  I agree with Larry's thought that the records

(transcripts) should not have been changed because when the student

graduated he or she was what they were at the time of graduation.  I

felt we should just add copies of the court documents to their education

records.

 

In both cases we received a Court Order Granting Change of Name of

Adult, specifically stating that all public documents be changed to

reflect new name and gender, to include birth certificates.  To me this

seems ludicrous.  Oh well, we obey the wishes and all student

educational records still in existence are changed.

 

 

DuWayne Headrick

Records Management Officer

Northside ISD

210-397-8574

[log in to unmask] 

 

>>> [log in to unmask] 11/14/08 2:28 PM >>>

Wow... now HERE'S a touchy subject!!

 

My initial thought is how/why would the records from the past (prior to

the

surgery, etc.) ever be changed and how could this be done

legitimately??? 

The record is related to the person's identity at the time it was

created

and once it's changed, it's a new record, right?  And the student

existed

under another name/identity at the time they (the records) were

created, right?

 

When a person gets married or divorced, their records don't get

changed. 

And Angie mentioned that they would potentially be changed if the

birth

certificate was changed, but do counties and/or states make changes of

this

type to vital records, because the legal system is supposed to ensure

that

the official record remains unchanged.  

 

The person was born as who they were, that doesn't EVER change,

regardless

of what other aspects of their being might.

 

The only cases I'm aware of where something of this nature happens is

in

witness protection cases, but even then, the records are simply sealed

and/or custody of them is transferred to the controlling agency... and

there

are numerous cases documented where although the physical records were

sealed, they made an "oopsie!" and failed to expunge the microfilm

copies of

the record, or if the individual was old enough to be in the physical

bound

record log books, failed to redact those records.

 

As a number of folks here will tell you, I'm as (if not MORE) liberal

than

the next guy... but a record is a record, and I don't see any

legitimate

reason that it be changed in this case.

 

Larry

 

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html 

Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already

present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of

the message.

mailto:[log in to unmask] 

 

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html

Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of
the message.

mailto:[log in to unmask]

 

______________________________________________________________________

This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.

For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 

______________________________________________________________________


______________________________________________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information which is confidential to, and/or privileged in favor of, CDI Corporation or its affiliated companies (CDI) or CDI's customers.  Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or distribution by the recipient is prohibited without prior written approval from an authorized CDI representative.  This notice must appear in any such authorized reproduction, disclosure or distribution.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message and any attachments.  Thank you.

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2