Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:39:09 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
We recently ran into this problem when we received an open records request
by a local newspaper for all City Council email. Our policy simply states that,
unless the person sending the correspondence has specifically expressed a
desire to have the correspondence remain private, all correspondence is public
record. While looking through the City Council public mail box, we found many
emails that included that routine confidentiality disclaimer and concluded that
this was not enough, in itself, to keep this correspondence out of public view.
Our attorneys, along with the rest of the staff, have been instructed to clearly
label emails with "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line in order to avoid confusion.
I'm failry certain however, that we have not seen the end of this particular
question...
As a side note, we are also in the very beginning stages of developing a policy
regarding retention of correspondence from out City hosted social networking
sites and other such related correpespondence. I know this was very recently
brought up, and would be extremely interested to hear if any other home-rule
municipaities have developed a policy for handling this.
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|