RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gordy Hoke <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Gordy Hoke <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:00:06 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
My first "takeaway" from this opinion is that organizations must be extremely forceful and proactive about enacting their legal hold programs. 

It seems that it is not enough to establish policies, talk to employees, and send emails and memoranda telling them to preserve records. In fact, it is apparently insufficient to let employees decide what records fall under a legal hold order. 

The appropriate action seems to be to be: 
1) To train, educate, and test employees for their understanding of legal hold procedures, teaching a very broad viewpoint.

2) First, require record owners, and, second, specifically, forcefully direct record owners to produce (not just retain) all records that might be required by the court

As I get it, it's records production that counts.  Good intentions and $4 will get you a latte'.  Or as the guy on DDR X implores, "Show me!"

 

This is my personal take from a first reading.  I hope to hear how you view this.

 

Stay tuned,

 

Gordy

Gordon E.J. Hoke, CRM

http://PositivelyRIM.blogspot.com

[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2