RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Creamer, William" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 4 Oct 2011 16:19:43 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (67 lines)
Trudy, you are not identifying the problem correctly because you are
concentrating your thought on the details of the process, and not
looking at the big picture. 

They are not charging 30 dollars for a summary bill and 75 dollars for a
detailed bill because of paper and delivery costs, so addressing that
issue is not going to get you anywhere. 

In the big picture they are charging this to see if they can get away
with it, plain and simple. Storage is pretty much a commodity now and
everyone knows what everyone else is charging. Business is down, real
estate holdings are devalued and yet costs continue to rise. The easiest
fastest way to bring in more cash is to squeeze your existing clients,
so that is what they are trying. Obviously from responses here some
people will just pay it, it's not their money, you know the attitude...

You also know that to the vendor, the difference between producing a
detailed bill (which will actually telling you if they are miss-billing
you, rather than a summary, with which you have no clue) or a summary
bill is the difference of selecting one report from a list over another
- in other words, almost no difference. So the cost differential should
not be $45! 

If you don't call them to task on this as I've done, well as I said,
it's part of the job.

William Creamer
Records & Conflicts
WF&G LLP
NY, NY


-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Trudy M Phillips
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 3:27 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [RM] Charges for Invoicing

If you do not currently receive that in an email, ask if the fee can be

waived if it is emailed.  Or, ask if they have a customer statement link
on  
their website you can go to and get your statement.
 
Many types of companies are switching to these methods to avoid the cost
of 
 preparing, and mailing a paper statement.
 
Trudy M.  Phillips
Business Consultant
"Bringing Order Out of Chaos"
205-699-8571  Fax 205-699-3278
_www.trudyphillips.com_ (http://www.trudyphillips.com/) 



***********************************************************************

IMPORTANT NOTICE:  This email message is intended to be received only by persons entitled to receive the confidential information it may contain.  Email messages to clients of Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP presumptively contain information that is confidential and legally privileged; email messages to non-clients are normally confidential and may also be legally privileged.  Please do not read, copy, forward or store this message unless you are an intended recipient of it.  If you have received this message in error, please forward it back.  Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP is a limited liability partnership organized in the United States under the laws of the State of Delaware, which laws limit the personal liability of partners.
***********************************************************************

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2