Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:51:46 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Blake,
Is the "defunct" designation a module within your RMA, or are you
managing those records outside of your RMA?
Thanks,
Gary
Gary Link, CRM
[log in to unmask]
-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Blake Richardson
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 10:45 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Obsolete Records in Retention Schedule
Good morning Sarah; my staff and I have also been going through a major
retention schedule overhaul, addressing some of the same issues. In our
case we remove the record series from the schedule and "defunct" the
record series in our physical records management application. Our
defunct mechanism still allows the retention of the boxes to be managed,
but no new boxes can be classified using the code.
Thanks
Blake
Confidential Information: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Additionally, the sender does not accept any responsibility for any loss, disruption or damage to your data or computer system that may occur while using data contained in, or transmitted with, this e-mail. If you have received this e-mail in error, please reply immediately to the sender and permanently delete this transmission, including any attachments.
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|