RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 23 Dec 2011 16:47:19 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (61 lines)
unfortunately this went back to Doug and not to the list

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 4:46 PM
Subject: Re: [RM] Documents vs Records
To: Doug Smith <[log in to unmask]>




On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Doug Smith <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>
> This is exactly the point and one of the things Leigh Isaacs and I have
> been addressing in our presentations.  However, I think it misses the point
> that, we can no longer talk about records without the documents or data.
> It does no good to have a records retention/disposition policy without
> addressing the non-records.



fully agree we are headed back in time to how items were treated in the
paper world before ECM and unstructured data. In the paper only world there
was no distinction made between documents and records. once a draft was
done with or replaced by a newer draft it was thrown away no need to keep
it. "Records declaration" took place when an item was put in a file folder
and then in a cabinet.

the problem as I see it is that when document management systems came along
organizations didn't want to make the decision about how to handle them
from a retention standpoint.  and they should have. as we regularly preach
here content is the king and the media comes second

-- 
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va
http://twitter.com/RAINbyte
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RAINbyte/
http://paper.li/RAINbyte/rainbyte
Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the
electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers



-- 
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va
http://twitter.com/RAINbyte
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RAINbyte/
http://paper.li/RAINbyte/rainbyte
Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the
electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2