Plaintiffs v. Peck – A Worthy Addition to Your Summer Reading List |
eLessons Learned
The Moore v. Publicis<http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/legaltechnology/recusal.pdf>‘s
ticket to fame has been the epic battle between the parties and Magistrate
Judge Andrew J. Peck, U.S.M.J., a known e-discovery advocate, over whether
the parties will use predictive coding, a type of computer-assisted
discovery.  Plaintiffs
lost<http://articles.law360.s3.amazonaws.com/0334000/334594/mnt/rails_cache/https-ecf-nysd-uscourts-gov-cgi-bin-show_doc-pl-caseid-375665-de_seq_num-615-dm_id-9953837-doc_num-175.pdf>on
their request
for review<http://www.ediscoverylaw.com/stats/pepper/orderedlist/downloads/download.php?file=http%3A//www.ediscoverylaw.com/uploads/file/P%2520Reply%2520to%2520D%2520response%2520to%2520P%2520Objections.pdf>of
Judge Peck’s first-of-its-kind opinion, in which he explicitly
approved
the use of predictive coding.

http://bit.ly/NmCwLG

Source: http://ellblog.com/?p=2999
See if people are clicking on this link: http://bit.ly/NmCwLG+
Try the bitly.com sidebar to see who is talking about a page on the web:
http://bitly.com/pages/sidebar

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]