a simple acronym LOCKSS http://www.lockss.org/ On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Steward, David < [log in to unmask]> wrote: > > The only solution to preventing loss as opposed to reducing the risk of > loss is to have more than one copy of any vital record. And this has been > pointed out regarding the practice of duplication. Now, I might not be > willing to bet all of my money on our ability to reconstruct/retrieve every > item. I do sleep well at night knowing that we have processes in place to > create redundancy for vital records. > -- Peter Kurilecz CRM CA [log in to unmask] Richmond, Va http://twitter.com/RAINbyte http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RAINbyte/ http://paper.li/RAINbyte/rainbyte http://pinterest.com/pakurilecz/archives/ http://pinterest.com/pakurilecz/records-management/ http://www.linkedin.com/in/peterakurilecz Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message. mailto:[log in to unmask]
