Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 21 Sep 2012 09:14:01 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Chris Flynn <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Just a hunch
> If they have trademarked the acronym they can "chose" who to pursue for
> infringement. They don't "have" to sue anybody. If they do chose to sue,
> any
> org that has infringed better hope they have not rounded the corners on
> their rectangle.
>
I'd have to agree As Jim pointed out, if they had to, this organization
http://www.arma-cert.org/ which pre-dates ARMA, in ANY form and certifies
it members would have been after them a long time ago.
>
> Another point might be that G**P ain't GAAP. It never will be, but that is
> another thread.
>
There is NO QUESTION that G**P doesn't rise anywhere near the level of GAAP
when it comes to acceptance, recognition, or legally binding opinion.
And NO... it doesn't merit a new thread for discussion. All of those who
would care to discuss it have left to join the Mothership for the next few
days
Larry
[log in to unmask]
--
*Lawrence J. Medina
Danville, CA
RIM Professional since 1972*
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|