RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Carol E.B. Choksy" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 27 Mar 2013 11:58:39 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (56 lines)
Dearest All,

 

This was a really interesting conversation yesterday on the listserv that
had a lot of different facets to it. I was particularly interested in
someone calling anything that needed to be preserved (for an undisclosed
lower limit of time) a "record" and then further refining that to "business
records" if it was listed on the retention schedule and "legal hold record"
if it was needed for litigation production. My thoughts on the issue were
too lengthy to put here, so I wrote them up here http://bit.ly/YIkKsZ .

 

Tell me if I'm wrong, but preserving something doesn't make it a "record"
and putting it in an application to preserve it doesn't make it a "record"
either.

 

Best wishes,

Carol

 

Carol E.B. Choksy, PhD CRM PMP

CEO

IRAD Strategic Consulting, Inc.

 <mailto:[log in to unmask]> [log in to unmask]

317-294-8329

 

Adjunct Lecturer

School of Library and Information Science

Indiana University, Bloomington

 <mailto:[log in to unmask]> [log in to unmask]

IRAD watermark 2 copy

 


List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2