RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nicholas Brookes <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 27 Mar 2013 13:48:02 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (108 lines)
A good illustration is E-mails.  A recent reveiw at DOA determined that only 10% of all the emails being kept were records and every thing else was transitory and could be destroyed after its usefulness was over

Dr. Robert L. Bailey, ECM, MIT, ECMp
McCarran International Airport

----- Original Message -----
From: "Luciana Duranti" <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 9:35:34 AM
Subject: Re: Preserved documents called "records"

I could not agree more.  To identify an entity as "record" is not an
appraisal decision but a recognition of its nature. Documents are any
information affixed to a medium.  Records are all those documents that
participate in an activity, all of them, regardless of how long you keep
them.    

Luciana

Dr. Luciana Duranti 
Chair and Professor | Archival Studies
School of Library, Archival, and  Information Studies
The University of British Columbia | The Irving K. Barber Learning Centre
470-1961 East Mall East Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1
Phone 604 822 2587 | Fax 604 822 6006
[log in to unmask] | www.slais.ubc.ca |
Director | The InterPARES Project | www.interpares.org I
Director I Centre for the International Study of Contemporary Records and
Archives
www.ciscra.org | www.lucianaduranti.ca |




-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of Carol E.B. Choksy
Sent: March-27-13 8:59 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Preserved documents called "records"

Dearest All,

 

This was a really interesting conversation yesterday on the listserv that
had a lot of different facets to it. I was particularly interested in
someone calling anything that needed to be preserved (for an undisclosed
lower limit of time) a "record" and then further refining that to "business
records" if it was listed on the retention schedule and "legal hold record"
if it was needed for litigation production. My thoughts on the issue were
too lengthy to put here, so I wrote them up here http://bit.ly/YIkKsZ .

 

Tell me if I'm wrong, but preserving something doesn't make it a "record"
and putting it in an application to preserve it doesn't make it a "record"
either.

 

Best wishes,

Carol

 

Carol E.B. Choksy, PhD CRM PMP

CEO

IRAD Strategic Consulting, Inc.

 <mailto:[log in to unmask]> [log in to unmask]

317-294-8329

 

Adjunct Lecturer

School of Library and Information Science

Indiana University, Bloomington

 <mailto:[log in to unmask]> [log in to unmask]

IRAD watermark 2 copy

 


List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance To unsubscribe from
this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE
RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2