Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:10:38 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I would suggest that data maps, records inventories and retention
schedules are logically related, and map to each other in logical and
consistent ways. Or at least, they had better, because if they don't,
you're likely to have problems.
Julie J. Colgan wrote:
> Thanks, Mary, for the clarification. I still contend that they are
> different, though. Perhaps the Data Map is simply the Records Inventory
> 2.0, but it is a necessary and valuable evolution in my opinion.
>
> Julie
>
>
--
Best regards,
John
John Montaņa
Montaņa & Associates
29 Parsons Road
Landenberg Pennsylvania 19350
610-255-1588
484-653-8422 mobile
[log in to unmask]
www.montana-associates.com
twitter: @johncmontana
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|