Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 6 Jun 2013 08:34:55 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Brian.
I totally understand what you are saying. But IMHO we seem to be running
away from the "records" term. To your point "not media dependent" - isn't
that a basis for how we define what a record is? It isn't the format but
the content that matters - that is what has been run into my brain since
the dawn of electronic records.
When I see a presentation like the one PK linked to it makes me wonder.
Everything the author covered are considerations I as a records manager
must take into account when implementing a records (and information
management) program. We've essentially let others highjack our
principals.
To paraphrase one of my favorite songs from Billy Joel:
"Everybody's talkin' 'bout the new term (information governance)
Funny, but it's still records and information management to me"
Bruce White, CRM, PMP
Virginia Beach, VA
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/bblanco
Sometimes the questions are complicated
and the answers are simple.
Dr. Seuss
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Records Management <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Aloha Bruce,
>
> Shedding the "Records" stigma has been a discussion point for years within
> ARMA...Perhaps, it's one of the reasons why the acronym ARMA no longer
> means Association of Records Managers & Administrators anymore. The
> primary concern about using the term "records" is its close association
> with the management of "paper". I think the use of "information" (which is
> widely used in Canada for years versus records) is to assert that managing
> data/content is the focus and not "media" dependent.
>
> Yeah, I guess RM does have a complex and that is getting people to
> understand that Records Management goes beyond managing paper...
>
> Just my two cents...
>
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|