RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 11 Jun 2013 08:57:13 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
To Support or Not Support the DoD 5015.2 Standard (Some pet peeves and
views on the debate from a RIM practitioner’s perspective) -
Why are the discussions and serious work on standards for managing
Government electronic records in the US always limited to DoD 5015.2, as
though it is the only existing standard?  As Don very convincingly points
out, this standard is so outdated and inadequate in many ways. This is
particularly noticeable when it is compared with others such as MoReq 2010,
ISO 16175 and the Object Management Group’s Records Management Services
(RMS) specification.

http://bit.ly/18sn9lx

Source:
http://www.aiim.org/community/blogs/community/To-Support-or-Not-Support-the-DoD-50152-Standard-(Some-pet-peeves-and-views-on-the-debate-from-a-RIM-practitionere28099s-perspective)
See if people are clicking on this link: http://bit.ly/18sn9lx+
Try the bitly.com sidebar to see who is talking about a page on the web:
http://bitly.com/pages/sidebar

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2