Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 25 Jun 2013 14:32:36 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Diane said, "someone who was attempting to use that practice to work
around discovery rules..."
I'd point out that law enforcement in Europe routinely does this in order
to sidestep retention rules - for example, the UK police may not have
enough evidence for an arrest and are required to destroy evidence after a
period of time (fingerprints), so ask some friends in Germany to request
the evidence prior to its destruction. The evidence is then subject to
German retention rules, and can be requested of the German authorities at a
later date.
I'm not saying it's right, or even legal, but that it's done. And, of
course, who will prosecute?
-D
Dr. David T. Macknet
MCP, MCSD, BA, MSc, MLitt, PhD
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|