RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lauren Williams <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 27 Jun 2013 13:48:39 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (113 lines)
Sent from my iPad

On Jun 26, 2013, at 8:29 PM, "Andrew Warland" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I work for a (major business unit - aged and childrens care) of the Uniting
> Church here in Australia. I developed extensive records retention schedules
> for all our business records which are, in many respects, not much
> different from any other business. We have around 150 separate pieces of
> Federal and State legislation we have to abide by, making it a complex
> organisation. Parts of the broader organisation have some very old records,
> some of which we are now scanning to have a back up in case of disaster, as
> well as to provide a much more convenient form of access.
> 
> I haven't yet got to the specific church/parish/congregation records yet
> but note that records of births, deaths and marriages are managed by the
> State Government. What would be left would be meetings of the
> church/parish/congregation and they generally seem to have been kept for a
> long time. When my mother died, for example, the minister was able to say
> that the records showed that, when she was married in the same church 60
> years earlier, the minister at the time noted that the family had been
> connected with (and was involved in building) the church 100 years earlier
> - in the late 1840s.
> 
> Andrew Warland
> Information Architect, Document and Records Management
> UnitingCare NSW.ACT
> Sydney
> Australia
> (My views entirely)
> 
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Mike Intranuovo <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
> 
>> Wow! Thanks for all the info and entertaining commentary. It makes sense
>> that churches would have to abide by the same rules and regulations as
>> everyone else. It's also interesting to consider those records that would
>> be governed by church law/policy. I think the guidelines that Tom pointed
>> out do a pretty good job of identifying business records opposed to
>> church/religious records. Well, I'm glad I asked; I learned a lot, and I
>> appreciate all the input. Thanks again!
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]
>>> wrote:
>> 
>>> What is it they say about things "carved in stone" ??
>>> 
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ah-WdAwVg9c
>>> 
>>> And I understand destruction services were provided by "Burning Bush,
>> Inc."
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 2:32 PM, John Montana <
>>> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Which simply illustrates that the principles of information governance
>>> are
>>>> truly timeless.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Gordy Hoke wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> But, John, as you have heard me say:  Moses, being a good records
>>>>> manager, had a disaster recovery hot spot at the ready.  After
>> smashing
>>> the
>>>>> tablets, he went back up Mt. Sinai to get a backup copy.  We still
>> call
>>> it
>>>>> "backup" today.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> "Some, such as the 10 Commandments, would strictly speaking have been
>>>>> enrolled copies of enacted legislation, and should thus have come
>> under
>>> the
>>>>> agency of the Israelite State Archives Agency, and been placed in the
>>> State
>>>>> Archives.  Until, that is, Moses implemented his records disposition
>>> policy
>>>>> in respect of them.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Makes shredding seem positively tame, doesn't it?
>>>>> J.
>>>> **
>>> 
>>> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
>>> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
>>> present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of
>> the
>>> message.
>>> mailto:[log in to unmask]
>> 
>> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
>> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
>> To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
>> present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the
>> message.
>> mailto:[log in to unmask]
> 
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
> To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
> mailto:[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2