RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Anne Pfeffer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 2 Jul 2013 10:24:52 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
<<<I do wish to point out that in my original post I do not suggest 
eliminating the trigger, but rather defining it in the records series 
entry so as to eliminate the "ACT" from the retention code itself to make 
it simply a number.>>

In our schedule we define when active ceases...such as with employment 
termination, expiration of contract, disposition of asset, etc.  So the 
ACT+XX is still the requirement but the trigger is defined in the schedule 
notes.

Regards,

Anne T. Pfeffer

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2