RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Frederic Grevin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 15 Jul 2013 20:42:59 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Wayne, if the retention of the information on these records is truly PERMANENT, I most definitely would NOT destroy the paper records. 

Nothing electronic comes even close to matching the durability and ease of preservation of good quality paper, properly stored.

In effect, there's 
- the EVIDENTIARY status (which is the official record?);
- the ACCESS copy (electronic); and
- the PRESERVATION copy (paper). Note that, in this context "preservation" is not used in the legal sense of preservation for discovery.

It's the same information in different formats, so why bother to create multiple retention schedules?

Best regards,

Fred
-----------------------------------------------------------
Frederic J. Grevin, Vice-President
Records Management Department
New York City Economic Development Corporation • www.nycedc.com
[log in to unmask] • w. 212.312.3903 • mobile 917.510.3016 • f. 212.618.5722

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2