Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 24 Jul 2013 12:08:55 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Not as glorious a story as Christian's example of a Visitor Log but another
example of why "decommissioning records" are of value... even/especially on
assets you took over from prior organizations.
http://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20130716/articles/130719626
You may also want to click the "related stories" links on the lower left of
this page.
Larry
[log in to unmask]
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Christian Meinke <[log in to unmask]
> wrote:
> I would just add, there are a lot of variables depending on the asset -
> decommissioning a nuclear plant will have a lot more requirements than
> tearing down an old office building. I think one thing you'll want to keep
> in mind is that sites often have multiple assets that may be connected,
> where removing an asset of one kind facilitates it's replacement with
> another so that any "Life of" retention you may be following may require
> some interpretation. Also, while most of us are not trained archivists you
> still might want to give consideration to the preservation of certain
> artifacts, photographs, or other records that might have historic value.
> We recently retired a power plant that had a log book signed by Thomas
> Edison when he visited the site over 100 years ago.. The retention expired
> on that long ago, but we're still going to hang on to that one.
> ***
> Christian Meinke, CRM
>
--
*Lawrence J. Medina
Danville, CA
RIM Professional since 1972*
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|