Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 13 Aug 2013 09:49:53 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I don't recall if these had been posted before. They are free as PDFs, just
scroll down for the download link.
Where the Money Goes: Understanding Litigant Expenditures for Producing
Electronic Discovery
Pretrial discovery procedures are designed to encourage an exchange of
information that will help narrow the issues being litigated, eliminate
surprise at trial, and achieve substantial justice. But, in recent years,
some have claimed that the societal shift from paper documents to
electronically stored information (ESI) has led to sharper increases in
discovery costs than in the overall cost of litigation.
http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1208.html
The Cost of Producing Electronic Documents in Civil Lawsuits: Can They Be
Sharply Reduced Without Sacrificing Quality?
According to a RAND study, document review makes up 73 percent of discovery
costs. Predictive coding is the most promising option for cutting costs
without compromising the quality of the process.
http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9650.html
Best wishes,
Carol
Carol E.B. Choksy, PhD CRM PMP
Information Governance Blog
<http://iradconsulting.com/wordpress/> http://iradconsulting.com/wordpress/
CEO
IRAD Strategic Consulting, Inc.
<mailto:[log in to unmask]> [log in to unmask]
317-294-8329
Adjunct Lecturer
Department of Information and Library Science
School of Informatics and Computer Science
Indiana University, Bloomington
<mailto:[log in to unmask]> [log in to unmask]
IRAD-favicon
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|