The ISO TAG (technical action group) that is developing the revision is made up of representatives from each member country. The US is technically represented by ANSI but they sub it out to other associations. ARMA is the U.S. rep for this particular TAG. The various drafts are reviewed and edited by the TAG or a subgroup of the TAG called a SC. Some countries on the TAG disseminate all the drafts to groups within their organizations and the others do not. At a certain point in time, the revised document becomes a Draft International Standard (DIS) that is opened for public comment. ARMA should be notifying the various lists that the draft is available. Since NARA is a part of the U.S. rep, they also sometimes post the link to the draft for public review.
Ginny Jones
(Virginia A. Jones, CRM, FAI)
Records Manager
Information Technology Division
Newport News Dept. of Public Utilities
Newport News, VA
[log in to unmask]
-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Peter Kurilecz
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 8:45 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [RM] Fwd: [RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK] Revision of ISO 15489?
from the UK RM List
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Rachel Hardiman <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:59 AM
Subject: [RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK] Revision of ISO 15489?
To: [log in to unmask]
Hello all,
I've just seen a post to the Australian records management list which deals with a substantial revision of the RM standard ISO 15489 that is apparently well under way, with the next round of comments due by 7th January. Unless I've been very much asleep on the job, I don't recall seeing anything about this on the 'northern hemisphere' lists. The ISO website indicates that Edition 2 of the standard is 'under development'
http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_ics/catalogue_detail_ics.htm?csnumber=62542
Does anyone know anything about this review? If it is in progress globally, how do we (as communities of practice or individuals) comment on it?
Regards,
Rachel Hardiman
linkedin.com/pub/rachel-hardiman/22/915/45b<http://www.linkedin.com/pub/rachel-hardiman/22/915/45b>
twitter.com/Paradoxographer
uva.academia.edu/RachelHardiman
For any technical queries re JISC please email [log in to unmask] For any content based queries, please email [log in to unmask]
--
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA IGP
[log in to unmask]
Dallas, Texas
Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org http://twitter.com/RAINbyte http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RAINbyte/
http://paper.li/RAINbyte/rainbyte
http://pinterest.com/pakurilecz/archives/
http://pinterest.com/pakurilecz/records-management/
http://www.linkedin.com/in/peterakurilecz
Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
