Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 5 Mar 2014 11:31:08 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Jeanne,
I wouldn't recommend adding to the retention schedule. Instead a process
for the destruction of the tapes should be included in the rotation
policy/procedure. Of course your IS department then needs to follow it.
Bruce White, CRM, PMP
Virginia Beach, VA
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/bblanco
Sometimes the questions are complicated
and the answers are simple.
Dr. Seuss
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Callen, Jeanne M <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
> Peter,
>
> I am talking about the actual physical destruction of the tape (they are
> currently rotated now but eventually are destroyed). I have a meeting
> today with our IS person responsible for this - I can almost guarantee
> there is no policy in place - maybe a procedure but not a policy.
>
> Just trying to determine if I should have the series added to the record
> retention schedule - I never thought they belonged there before but if
> there is no current policy in place I think they should be listed somewhere.
>
> And, if there is a destruction certificate - it should be listed as well.
>
> I appreciate everyone's feedback.
>
>
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|