Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 26 Jul 2014 21:18:00 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 5:14 AM, Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> Larry reread it again. The House wouldn't do the firing the agencies would.
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 7:25 PM, PeterK <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > A House committee on Thursday approved measures that would require
> > federal
> > > agencies to preserve instant messages and fire workers who destroy
> > records
> > > — concerns that have come to light in the ongoing IRS
> > >
> > This is rich... the House is gonna "fire workers who destroy records".
> >
> > How about we ask those same House members to write down the definition
> of a
> > record in the Federal arena?
>
Splitting hairs, really... or semantics.
They're 'approving measures that would require' agencies to fire workers...
so while they may not be pulling the trigger, they're loading the weapon.
Larry
[log in to unmask]
--
*Lawrence J. Medina Danville, CARIM Professional since 1972*
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|