Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 19 Nov 2014 18:05:58 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Paula,
The best resource for this might be to track down someone with a CRM and
ask them.
Chris Flynn
At large
[log in to unmask]
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Paula Sutton <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> Good day,
> I am updating a retention schedule for an highly regulated power company
> who has used *permanent *and *indefinite *liberally throughout their
> retention schedule. In my update I would like to change these to "life of
> asset," "life of plant," "termination + yrs." etc.
>
> They are wanting to see articles and case studies on why the use of
> *permanent
> *and *indefinite *should be changed. To jump start my research, I was
> hoping that the esteemed colleagues on the listserv could point me in the
> direction of some recent articles, publications or case studies.
>
> Many thanks!
>
> --
> *Paula Sutton, *CRM, IGP
> Records and Information Governance Consultant
> Records Matter LLC
> (970) 776-0285
> [log in to unmask]
> www.linkedin.com/in/paulasutton/
>
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
> To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
> present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the
> message.
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
>
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
|
|