I was, just today, told by a young, runny-nosed lawyer who shall remain nameless, that a records and information management professional does not have the "credentials" to legally define the difference between what is considered a "record" and what is "information" or, by his understanding (limited though it may be by his intellect), a "non-record" by definition.

I am calling upon "The Horde" to build a case to refute this argument at our next meeting.  What do you consider the best definition of a "record" vs. "information" and what is your argument?

My apologies if I am pre-empting "Friday Ponderings" (which I enjoy), but this is a IGP/CRM smack down!

Warmest regards,
Angela Fares

[log in to unmask] (if you want to go rogue)

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]