I have to admit that I am with Peter on this issue...professional response
or not (and yes...I did check outside to see if anything had frozen
over...lol). Anyone who doesn't want to read op-ed pieces can skip them,
unsubscribe, or refute them tastefully. I think it does everyone a service
to put the pieces out there and let people make up their own minds or do the
research to find out if the conclusions are based in fact using
authoritative sources. There is hardly a day at work when my senior
management is considering "opinion" on what is or is not considered best
practice...whether it is records management, public relations, etc. And, I
have seen records management retention decisions made based on the
expectations of certain groups who feel that they are entitle to obtain
information well beyond the required retention period.
I don't care what party a politician belongs to...if they are working
"outside" of a policy for their own convenience and are circumventing
controls meant to safeguard the right of the American public to obtain
information...I want to know what people think. Culturally, this creates
issues for me as a records and information manager because, if it OK for
high profile politicians to get away with that behavior and make trite
excuses to avoid adverse consequences, the employees within my organization
may begin to feel similarly entitled. People become "desensitized" to
having to follow rules because "it just doesn't work for them." That is
when things start to become security issues for me. Frankly, I am HAPPY to
see people get outraged about the allegation. It tells me that some people
still have a sense of integrity about following the rules when you accept
the job.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Kurilecz" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: What "news" is appropriate for posting here?
> well my humble apologies then, but do tell how one keeps the politics out
> of a story like this one?
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Dennis Tallerico <
> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> WOW - about as un-professional as it gets.
>>
>> Suggestion - just drop the politics.
>>
>> Dennis Tallerico
>> HFGroup AssureVault
>> [log in to unmask] | 440-386-4171 direct | 877-41-VAULT |
>> 440-729-3911 office | 440-479-7143 mobile
>>
>>
>> --
> Peter Kurilecz CRM CA IGP
> [log in to unmask]
> Dallas, Texas
> Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org
> http://twitter.com/RAINbyte
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RAINbyte/
> http://paper.li/RAINbyte/rainbyte
> https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archives-in-the-news
> http://pinterest.com/pakurilecz/archives/
> http://pinterest.com/pakurilecz/records-management/
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/peterakurilecz
> #*CantbeworsethanPeterk*
> <https://twitter.com/hashtag/CantbeworsethanPeterk?src=hash>
> Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the
> electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers
>
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
> To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
> present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the
> message.
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
|
