RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
mwhaider <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:08:06 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
I must disagree with Mr. Guerino.
This is the classic IT response that is the root of the digital landfill.
How did this thread start?  "New day but same stories"?
Of course there are records (paper and digital) that must/should be kept
for long term or permanent for the all reasons stated in the previous
responses.  But that does not mean that all the garbage - especially
digital garbage - should clog our storage devices and increase retrieval
times and effort.  This is essentially the same argument that many
companies still use to justify the "pack rat" mentality for "paper".  Life
cycle management applies to all records regardless of media and/or format.
Life cycle management is the "governance" for records and information and
if IT still doesn't get it then they should not be part of Information
Governance.

Mary

Mary W. Haider, MBA, CRM
Records & Information Manager and Consultant
[log in to unmask]
865-983-1371

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2