Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 20 Apr 2005 13:19:52 -0400 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At the very least, I believe that a "non-destruct" order or a "hold" placed
on destruction would stop the destruction of any media on which email and
other electronic records were held, until there was some "specificity"
stating that a backup copy would be sufficient. I would not want to be
caught destroying any primary copy, or any duplicate copy, unless there was
some specificity in a "non-destruct order"......
Douglas P. Allen, CRM, CDIA+
Business Development Manager
Global 360
3103 Sasparilla Cove
Austin, TX 78748
(512) 292-3817 -- direct
(512) 791-8027 -- cell phone
http://www.global360.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of Piotrowski, Charles
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 12:10 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Non-Destruct Notices and Back-Up Tapes
Hi Folks,
After reviewing my Business Laws, Inc. trilogy in 3 rings I am left with the
following question...
When a Non-Destruct Notice is issued, whet effect does it have on back-up
tapes (email and other electronic records)?
If back-up tapes are written over at the end of two weeks, does the
Non-Destruct prohibit the recycling?
Thanks,
-Chuck
Chuck Piotrowski
CVPS
Records Manager
(802)747-5447
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
|
|
|