RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: RAINdrip: A study in how NOT to establish a retention schedule and manage an RM Program
From:
"Allen, Doug" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:51:27 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines) 
Grayson County?  Hmmm... I think that I know the CRM on the listserv who has some experience with Grayson County.  I suspect that a thorough records inventory was completed about 10 years ago, and a substantial volume of records were most likely noted as eligible for destruction, based on the county's approved records retention schedule.... 
 
Doug Allen, CRM, CDIA+
(I've actually "done" Records Management in the past) - oops...sorry, I couldn't help that!  Please forgive!!!

________________________________

From: Records Management Program on behalf of Larry Medina
Sent: Mon 2/12/2007 2:07 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [RM] RAINdrip: A study in how NOT to establish a retention schedule and manage an RM Program



http://www.heralddemocrat.com/articles/2007/02/11/local_news/news04.txt

Yer gonna has to go through dem records and git rid o tha ones ya don't need
by sundown, pardner....
--
Larry Medina
Danville, CA
RIM Professional since 1972

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance



List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2