RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Sitter, Raylette" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 7 Jun 2007 11:40:08 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
I am trying to convince my boss the benefits of having all the file plan
/ retentions schedules signed off by all the VP's of the company (CEO,
Legal, Administration, Human Resources, Strategic Planning, & CFO).  I
feel the benefit in this is that in case there is a business or legal
requirement to extend a retention period, all the appropriate
departments can look at the file plan / retention schedules and make any
additional recommendations on a retention periods.  (Example:  The Legal
department thinking 5 years is an adequate retention on a file plan
level might not realize that the Tax department might need the same set
of records for 7 years for an IRS issue or accounting needing the
retention period for 7 years for SOX compliance). 

 

 Does anyone else have any selling points that I can present in order
the back this idea / thought up?  

 

Raylette 

 

Records Management Coordinator

 


List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2