RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 7 Jun 2007 13:09:10 -0500
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From:
"Sitter, Raylette" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
That is what I thought - It would just make good business sense to have
high level sign off.  But my boss (who is not a records management
expert) is VP of Administration, and she does not get the logics behind
it.  I will keep trying to sell the idea.  Thanks for the reply.

-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Sharon Burnett
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 12:28 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Retention Schedule Sign-offs by upper management

Aren't retention schedules are supposed to be legal documents? They are
also 
business documents. They should also be approved by the highest level of
a 
business or their delegate since they reflect how you do business.  It
would 
seem very basic to me to have strong and high level sign-off.

Cheers!
Sharon Burnett
Seattle WA

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2