There's something I've been wondering about...both on a personal and
professional level.  Thought maybe some of you would have some insight
on this...especially the archivists on here.

 

Increasingly, many "photographs" are digital and are therefore not
printed from a negative using traditional silver photographic
processing....but on a computer printer using "photographic paper" made
for those printers.  What is the comparison of longevity of the images
from the traditional process and the computer printed images?

 

Thanks in advance for any comments regarding this.

 

Gus Harris

Records Mgr.

Univ. of West FL

Pensacola, FL

[log in to unmask]


List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance