RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:06:50 -0400
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Executive order 12958 or Sandy Burger's socks
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
In-Reply-To:
A<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From:
"Link, Gary M." <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines) 
This list did discuss at length the Berger incident when it happened, as
a search on the list archives will show.  
But the Cheney issue is current, so we are discussing Cheney. But we can
compare/contrast it with Berger if you want. 

So maybe you think one guy was "in the rights" and the other guy was
evil, depending on you politics. Rufus Miles (whoever he was) said
"Where you stand depends on where you sit."  Me, I stand with keeping
this list apolitical.

Gary Link
Pittsburgh, PA


-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Childress [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 2:42 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [RM] Executive order 12958 or Sandy Burger's socks

Anyone have an opinion on whether VP Cheney should comply with National
Archives security inspections of his classified information sieve/office
or should we be focusing on Sandy Burger's socks instead?

Anyone?

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2